Chief Justice Tom Bathurst

Podcast of Supreme Court of NSW – Seven v Dowling – Allegation Chief Justice Tom Bathurst is a paedophile – Has Justice Kunc had a sexual relationship with Dr Nicky McWilliam – Judicial bribery etc.

In the below recording (KCoA Podcast) of myself, Justice Kunc and Seven’s barrister Kieran Smark some of the issues that are discussed are 1. Allegations Chief Justice Tom Bathurst and other judges are paedophiles and suspected paedophiles 2. Justice Kunc’s personal relationship with Nicky McWilliam and Bruce McWilliam and has Justice Kunc and Ms McWilliam previously had a sexual relationship 3. Judicial bribery 4. Perceived and actual bias.

It doesn’t matter whether you are a lawyer or have no understanding of the law the below podcast will be a real eyeopener to what is really happening in Australian courts and how corrupt they are. The first couple of minutes starts off slow but then it gets right into the corruption that has been ongoing for years in this matter and against me.

A brief background to the proceeding in the podcast.

Kerry Stokes and his associated companies have been running numerous SLAPP lawsuits against me since 2014 to try and silence me from writing about their criminal conduct and corruption. The matter in the podcast is Seven West Media & Seven Network v Shane Dowling Matter: 2017/116771. It was instituted in early 2017 against the publisher of the website SevenVersusAmber and later is was changed to be against me.

In July 2017 Seven also instituted contempt proceedings against me, for the third time if you include to of the other matters, but at about the same time Kerry Stokes and Seven took control of the website. The proceedings have been dragging on for a long time and no final hearing date has been set, as Justice Kunc refused to set one, and it should have been thrown out long ago for want of prosecution. Seven’s contempt hearing is set down to be heard on the 2nd of December 2019.

In July this year, I instituted contempt proceeding against Seven Network (Operations) Limited, Seven West Media Limited, Kerry Stokes, Bruce McWilliam, Tim Worner, barrister Kieran Smark and their lawyers Richard Keegan, Martin O’Connor and Alexander Latu. It is set down for the 3rd of December 2019.

On Friday the 15th of November 2019 Seven’s lawyer Richard Keegan emailed Justice Kunc’s associate, without my consent, saying they wanted the matter set down as they had a Notice of Motion, they wanted to be heard for better particulars in my contempt proceedings against them. Even though I objected on numerous grounds Justice Kunc set it doing for Friday the 22nd of November. I then asked for two applications by me to be set down on the same day. One for Justice Kunc to stand down for perceived and actual bias and an application for the matter to be transferred to Brisbane but I found out on Friday (22/11/19) at the hearing that my applications weren’t set down.

That shows actual bias by Justice Kunc as he heard Seven’s application on the 22/11/19 but refused to hear my applications even though they were requested on the same day (15/11/19) and one was for perceived and actual bias which should have taken precedent.

Barrister Kieran Smark was in court, but he was one of the respondents for my contempt proceedings against Seven etc and in a situation like that he can’t represent the others which he was in effect doing. As the podcast shows, I raised it numerous times and Justice Kunc allowed it which once again shows actual bias and corruption.

Click below to listen to the podcast. Justice Kunc and Kieran Smark SC where at the Supreme Court of NSW in Sydney and I was in Queensland on the phone as I moved permanently from Sydney a couple of weeks ago.

Both Justice Kunc and Seven’s barrister Kieran Smark are ducking and weaving throughout the podcast as I try to hold them to account.

You can also watch it on Youtube: Click here

Click below to listen to the audio version:

(There is one mistake in the podcast. I said that Justice John Sackar said they all need their own representation for contempt matters against them. It was actually Justice Clifton Hoeben who said it in a related matter)

I have recorded court twice before when I was in court in Sydney and published it (Click here to see the recordings) and no one complained and numerous judges were aware of it. It is legal to record phone calls in Queensland and my motivation for recording the above call was to expose the corruption.

Justice Kunc should have stood down from this matter when previously requested especially given his personal relationship with Dr Nicky McWilliam and her husband Seven’s Bruce McWilliam. (Click here to read the judgment where he refused to stand down)

In 2016 Justice Kunc received papal honours for his lifetime contribution to the Church in Sydney and he was named a Knight Commander of the Order of St Gregory the Great.

Justice Kunc - Papal award

Bishop Terry Brady at Cathedral House with papal honour recipients (from left) Justice Francois Kunc, Gemile Mellick and Neville Moses

Justice Kunc is a senior member of the Catholic Church which has been running the world’s largest paedophile ring for decades and this matter also deals with unchallenged allegations, by me, that Chief Justice Tom Bathurst and other judges are paedophiles or suspected paedophiles. On that basis alone Justice Kunc should be nowhere near the case and should have recused himself from hearing it.

To make the bias and/or perceived bias worse Chief Justice Tom Bathurst ordered senior court staff to have me jailed by making a false complaint to the police in September 2016 because I made the allegations about him and others being paedophiles or suspected paedophiles. The evidence is before the court in this matter because the applicants subpoenaed the evidence from the NSW police.

I asked Justice Kunc in the podcast if he would like to apologise to all the survivors of the paedophile priests in the Catholic Church, but he refused to.

That’s just the start of the evidence that says Justice Kunc and the Supreme Court of NSW should have nothing to do with this matter or any matter involving me. I’ll have plenty more to say on this matter in the future.

Please use the Twitter, Facebook, email and other buttons below and help promote this post.

Kangaroo Court of Australia is an independent website and is reliant on donations to keep publishing articles like the one above. If you would like to support the continuance of this site, please click on the button below to donate via PayPal or go to the donations page for other donation options. (Click here to go to the Donations page)

If you would like to follow this website, you can by email notification at the top right or left of this page and about twice a week you will be notified when there is a new article.

Thank you for your support.

8 replies »

  1. There is a solution to rid the world of these heinous individuals, but the apathetic masses prefer to bleat quietly among themselves as they wander aimlessly along the paths of life, allowing the herders to admonish punishment if a bleat is contrary to the herders’ corrupt, selfish, tuneless yaps.

  2. Excellent work. Gutsy as. That Keiran Smark has clearly been injected to confuse matters. Learn a few big words and string them together really slowly to tire you out trying to interpret them. It would have been the game plan between those 2 corrupted sparring parasites from the start. Even the judge wouldn’t have understood smark. Who could sit there and listen to that procrastinating drivel?
    Hit them for bullying tactics and for wasting the tax payer funded courts time and down time lost in your own wages. The entire industry is full of grubs.

Leave a Reply to JonCCancel reply