Garry Neilson - 2003

Has Judge Garry Neilson outed himself for being a paedophile given he implied incest and paedophilia are OK?

District Court Judge Garry Neilson has used a court of law to try to justify incest and paedophilia as being OK and acceptable to the public. What Judge Neilson has done is make it clear to everyone that he is a sick and perverted person who should be in jail. Judge Neilson said that “the community may no longer see sexual contact between siblings and between adults and children as “unnatural” or “taboo” and:

“District Court Judge Garry Neilson said just as gay sex was socially unacceptable and criminal in the 1950s and 1960s but is now widely accepted, “a jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner”.”

“He also said the “only reason” that incest is still a crime is because of the high risk of genetic abnormalities in children born from consanguineous relationships “but even that falls away to an extent [because] there is such ease of contraception and readily access to abortion”.” (Click here to read more)

This came to light during the course of an appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal in the last few days and Judge Neilson has at least one similar previous judgement which needs investigation as well.

Judge Garry Neilson “who compared incest to homosexuality this week — and suggested it was no longer taboo — once gave an incestuous rapist a lighter sentence because he did not ejaculate inside his young niece or “treat her roughly”. (Click here to read more)

Background

Judge Neilson is currently hearing a case that involves a man raping his sister. Justice Neilson made his scandalous comments during the course of the proceedings and disallowed certain evidence. The prosecution have appealed. From what I can tell they have appealed both the disallowing of evidence and also asked for another judge given Judge Neilson’s comments which clearly show he is a sick person and not fit to be a judge.

Circumstantial case that Judge Neilson is a paedophile

When Judge Garry Neilson started making the scandalous statements in court he knew what would happen. All judicial officers know what they say in court is recorded and dissected by many parties including the media and they are fully aware of the consequences. They also know what they say in court can be used as grounds for an appeal and then three judges will have a good look at what they said. Judge Neilson would have been fully aware that an appeal was guaranteed once he said what he did. So what was Judge Neilson’s reason for knowingly ending his own career?

1. It is one thing to defend a person accused of being a paedophile as they might not be guilty but that is defending the person not the act. The only people that I have heard of that defend paedophilia as an act or as a crime is paedophiles themselves. I have never heard of anyone else defending it as an act or as a crime.

2. Judge Neilson knew exactly what he was doing and he knew it would get media attention. It seems like a deliberate rallying call to other paedophiles to support the issue as they are under attack from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse which is currently in progress. (Click here to read more on their website)

3. Judge Neilson must be close to the mandatory retirement age of 70 so he would know there is little damage that can be done to him from a financial or career viewpoint. He will still get the full pension and I suspect this is part of his thinking in deciding to say what he has and when.

4. Judge Neilson should have been investigated previously given his scandalous judgement in the matter where he “gave an incestuous rapist a lighter sentence” as quoted above.

5. Judge Neilson could and should be charged with the criminal offence of Scandalising the Court as he would have been fully aware that he was undermining the public’s confidence in the courts before he said what he did. So why does he do it? In my view only a paedophile would say and do what he did knowing he was damaging the judiciaries reputation.

Peter Hollingworth when he was Governor-General of Australia defended a paedophile priest and Hollingworth was forced to resign. Neilson should not be given the luxury of resigning and should be sacked as soon as possible.

I spoke to the Attorney-General’s office on Thursday regarding Judge Neilson and they asked for my feedback (I am told they asked for everyone’s feedback who called that day as the matter had only been reported in the media a few hours).

I said words to the effect that “there is a good chance that Judge Garry Neilson is a paedophile as they get off on pushing the boundaries and he would have been fully aware that there would be media attention regarding his comments. He has to go as he damages the reputation of all judges and the courts while he is still a judge.” My viewpoint would not have been greatly different from most people I suspect.

I should give credit where it is due as the relatively new Attorney-General Brad Hazzard has moved fast and Justice Nielson has now been suspended from hearing criminal matters.

The SMH is reporting:

Mr Hazard had initially refused to be drawn on Judge Neilson’s comments while MRM’s trial was pending but in an about-face he issued a statement on Friday saying he had to refer the Judge to the commission because “confidence in the judiciary is a critical part of ensuring broader community support for the legal system”.

Mr Hazard said he was acting on behalf of the community and that he had also written to the Chief Judge of the district Court, Reg Blanch, requesting that Judge Neilson not sit on any criminal trials until the commission had examined his complaint.

It is understood that on Thursday a senior NSW official referred the NSW judiciary to the royal commission after it was determined it could be defined as an “institution”. (Click here to read more)

The commission referred to above that will investigate Judge Neilson is the Judicial Commission on News South Wales which is mostly a toothless tiger as they have no powers themselves and only make recommendations to the government. But at least that is a start and it must be noted that the Judicial Commission did recommend that the state government consider sacking Magistrate Jennifer Betts and Magistrate Brian Maloney in 2011. Both were directed to address parliament and show cause why they shouldn’t be sacked. (Click here to read more)

It is also noteworthy that Judge Neilson has also been referred to the Royal Commission into Child Abuse that is currently afoot. That is what should happen and it would be explosive to see Judge Neilson in the witness-box justifying his statements. There has been a very strong rumour for a long time that a paedophile ring operates in the Australian judiciary and I think it is something that has to be looked at closely especially given Judge Neilson’s comments.

There really needs to be an independent Royal Commission into the judiciary by itself but lets start with Judge Neilson at the Child Abuse Royal Commission. If the Royal Commission does not call Judge Neilson as a witness then the Royal Commission is saying that judges are above being accountable.

Admin: I will be in court next Tuesday defending myself for the crime of journalism against Kerry Stokes so I will not do another post until after then.

Please use the Twitter, Facebook and email etc. buttons below and promote this post.

This site is independent and reliant on donations to keep publishing. If you would like to support the continuance and growth of this site it would be greatly appreciated if you make a donation. Click on the button below to donate via PayPal or go to the donations page for other donation options (Click here to go to the Donations page)

And make sure you follow this site by email which is at the top right of this page and about twice a week you be notified when there is a new post on this site.

Thank you for your support.

Tags: , , , , , ,

21 Comments on “Has Judge Garry Neilson outed himself for being a paedophile given he implied incest and paedophilia are OK?”

  1. Janelise C July 11, 2014 at 11:03 pm #

    Good luck for Tuesday – and every day! Here’s hoping you succeed in getting rid of another piece of trash in our “judiciary” with this latest expose’

  2. Lynne Gray July 11, 2014 at 11:33 pm #

    That was my instant thought.

  3. Tony Hutton July 11, 2014 at 11:47 pm #

    Man, am I out of step with the rest of Society according to Judge Garry Neilson, thinking that these people are Sick Puppies.???

  4. ohdeah July 12, 2014 at 7:11 am #

    What a disgraceful sick man! What is the world coming to?

  5. Pam Liddell July 12, 2014 at 8:11 am #

    Appalling, he may well be a molester anyhow, he needs to loose is job immediately

  6. Barrie Macmillan July 12, 2014 at 8:24 am #

    Shane….I wish you the best of luck on Tuesday. I agree with Janelise C in the opening comment about this judicial trash.

  7. Linda Bennett July 12, 2014 at 8:46 am #

    Yes!

    Regards, Linda Bennett

  8. curious July 12, 2014 at 9:29 am #

    Sounds like this judge has a axe to grind and is now blackmailing his employers who have blackmailed him if he is a pedophile. If this is true their is now an open window into how blackmail works in the judiciary. In the UK at the moment there is a scandal that there is over 20 politicians implicated from the 80s in either pedophiles or covering it up.

  9. nottwistedyet July 12, 2014 at 11:11 am #

    Shane,

    Agree totally that a Royal Commission into The Judiciary is indeed overdue.

    Best wishes for Tuesday, I thought I heard this guy is in trouble with a few things on his television-channel?
    Sometimes money is not everything, hope that is how it works for you!

    • It is I only July 20, 2014 at 11:05 am #

      ROYAL COMMISSION?? Who’s chairing it??
      Why not a kind of GRAND JURY where people are selected from the electoral roll!
      I personally don’t trust a system, where mates are investigating mates!

  10. Ken.T. July 12, 2014 at 12:16 pm #

    Shane Good Luck on Tuesday and all the days to come. This Judge Garry Neilson has to be dismissed and fully investigated. He isn’t a dill and knew exactly what he was doing as you have rightly pointed out. No one in their own field of expertise would go out on a limb like he has with out having weighed up the eventual out come. If found to be a criminal in hiding, I can only hope as many will, that his pension and benefits are of no use to him, except for funeral expenses, when he gets released from prison.

  11. kurt flahavin July 12, 2014 at 10:36 pm #

    Is Judge Neilson delusional or just plain sick?. Incest is paedophilia, simple as that. Judge Neilson must never judge another case again. Is Judge Neilson basically defending paedophiles?. I think he is. Is the Royal Commission into sexual abuse investigating judges & lawyers who may be paedophiles and/or helping paedophiles?. Judge Neilson is one example, there may be more.

  12. Michael Vescio July 13, 2014 at 10:41 am #

    The fact that the Chief Justice of the District court has ordered that NIELSON no longer sit on Criminal Matters does NOT Correct the enormous error that has been made and is continually being made in ALL AUSTRALIAN COURTS simply due to the Fact the the JUDICIARY have the belief that they are above the law. THIS CULTURE HAS TO BE STAMPED OUT AND ANY JUDGE DOING THE WRONG MUST BE DEALT WITH BY THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT THE (CORRUPT) JUDICIAL COMMISSION WHICH ONLY PROTECTS JUDGES AND HAS DONE NOTHING AGAINST JUDGES IN THE 25 YEARS OF OPERATION
    Michael Vescio ( Oppressed People Of Australia.)

  13. Enough of the lies July 13, 2014 at 4:21 pm #

    Our society is not as sick as Justice Neilson thinks we are, but we know that he is one sick bugger for even countenancing such a reason to excuse such a crime.

  14. Louie2U July 13, 2014 at 7:48 pm #

    Reading this just made me sick. Every case this grossly inadequate representative of the judicial process has ever sat on needs to be investigated thoroughly. No excuses as to why not or it cannot be done. Reading this article reeks of the similar undertones that the Catholic Church utilised to cover up the crimes of their own for far too long. Priests and clergy covered up, diverted and got away with far too much. Now we have the judiciary and the prostiticians doing the same. There are no words in the english language useful enough to describe the sick, unhinged people who commit these acts let alone those who permit them or deem them ‘acceptable’.

  15. Paul July 14, 2014 at 8:20 am #

    Have I not said this often enough? They are only allowed to progress up the ladder if they have a suitable skeleton in their closet through which they can be owned and controlled. He’s made his a little obvious.

  16. ester July 14, 2014 at 11:59 am #

    Australia must deal once and for all with a Judiciary that is rotten to the core. If we want to have a fair country, and fair justice for all, we must have a Royal Comission into the Judiciary. Everytime that I think that you are going to court Shane, I can see you are a marked man. Are we really waiting for justice to be served in your case ???? I don’t think. Kerry Different Strokes, has more money than you… So people, we need to keep funding Shane….. At least I know that you are doing what i cannot do, due to lack of knowledge. Monetary Help is what you need…. All the best, and may this judge be a man of honour in your case….. best regards

  17. Peter July 14, 2014 at 1:41 pm #

    This is a case of ‘RAPE’ of a sibling by a sibling not a consensual sex act by siblings; both act are criminal acts by today’s standards and should be treated as such. This Judge seems to be on a Fairy flight and should be treated in a suitable institution.

  18. peter July 21, 2014 at 3:11 pm #

  19. LaRue July 22, 2014 at 1:02 pm #

    There’s petition on change.org in respect to this individual. Here’s the link for people to sign:

    https://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/nsw-attorney-general-remove-judge-garry-neilson-immediately-for-his-harmful-stance-on-incest-child-abuse-and-homosexuality#

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Scouts Australia refuse to answer questions re Judge Garry Neilson who supported paedophilia and incest | Kangaroo Court of Australia - July 26, 2014

    […] The RC will be asking the same questions I am doing as per my last post on Judge Neilson (Click here to read) and I am sure other journalists are having a good look into Neilson’s background as […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,742 other followers