Bill Shorten

Bill Shorten checkmated by Royal Commissioner Dyson Heydon

All types of court proceedings are quite often a game of strategy and with two moves Bill Shorten has been badly checkmated by Royal Commissioner Dyson Heydon. Counsel assisting the Royal Commission now has at least two opportunities to cross-examine Bill Shorten and that makes Stoljar’s job so much easier. Although it was never going to be too hard for Stoljar to nail Bill Shorten given Shorten’s finger prints are all over the crime scene of union corruption for the last 20 years or so.

It hit the media last Friday evening (12/6/15) that Bill Shorten had been notified by the Royal Commission late the day before (Thursday) that he was required to give evidence at the RC in August or September. It is likely that it was Bill Shorten who leaked the story.

Shorten let the media know that he was not happy about appearing in August or September and had asked the Royal Commission if he could give evidence earlier. The below letter from Shortens lawyers to the Royal Commission asks for an earlier appearance date.


Bill Shorten’s lawyers were trying a swifty. Not only did they want an earlier date but they also wanted it to be the only date as they say “so that he may address all issues of interest to the Commission”.

Shorten had a big problem in that the media had started to dig hard in the last week or so and found a lot of evidence of his corrupt conduct during his union days. Shorten decided he was better to give evidence early rather than later before more and more evidence of his handiwork hit the media.

The Royal Commission accepted Shorten’s request to give evidence in July but knocked him back on his request to address all issues as the below media statement shows.

Royal Commission media release – Thursday 18th June

Commissioner Dyson Heydon today issued a summons for the Honourable William Shorten to appear before him on Wednesday 8 July 2015.

The Commissioner has agreed to a request from lawyers representing Mr Shorten to bring forward the date of his proposed appearance from August/September.

The Commission’s preference had been to address all matters concerning Mr Shorten in one sitting. However, given Mr Shorten’s request to bring his examination forward by several months, this will now not be possible.

The hearing will be pursuant to Practice Direction 1, which means Mr Shorten will initially only be examined by Counsel Assisting.

Any person affected by Mr Shorten’s evidence will be able to apply for authorisation to cross examine him at a later date.

This has boxed Shorten in as Counsel Assisting Jeremy Stoljar gets to question Bill Shorten and then have a month or two before he questions him again. This allows Stoljar to investigate and check if the answers that Bill gave the first time are true and then question him again on the issues.

The only chance Bill Shorten had was to hold out until August or September and that way he would have only had to go in the witness stand once. If Shorten and his lies were good enough he might have had some hope. Now with the Royal Commission having at least two goes at Shorten he has no chance and it is very much checkmate.

Bill Shorten’s first wife Debbie Beale under investigation by the Royal Commission

Bill Shorten and his first wife Debbie Beale in 2007

Bill Shorten and his first wife Debbie Beale in 2007

It has been reported that the Royal Commission is investigating Bill Shorten’s first wife Debbie Beale:

“The Abbott government’s royal commission into union corruption has trawled through the personal affairs of Bill Shorten’s ex-wife as part of its investigation of the Opposition Leader in his former role as head of the Australian Workers Union.”

“Fairfax Media understands that Deborah Beale, Mr Shorten’s first wife and the daughter of a former Liberal MP, has been asked by the royal commission about some of her share dealings when she was married to Mr Shorten.” (Click here to read more)

I remember watching Bill Shorten on the ABC’s 7.30 Report last year and he said that he never earned over $100,000 when he was at the Australian Workers Union (AWU). That might be true but as we know from Craig Thomson etc. the big money working for the unions is the credit card usage and slush funds. If the Royal Commission checks Bill’s credit cards from when he was at the AWU he might be in trouble.

How will Bill Shorten answer questions at the Royal Commission?

A lot of the witnesses at the Royal Commission have been suffering from amnesia so I am curious how well Bill Shorten will answer questions. A clue might be in the interview that Shorten did with Neil Mitchell at Melbourne radio station 3AW on the 13th May 2015. Shorten ducked the same question 13 times in under 5 minutes. (Listen below)

(Click anywhere on the above video to listen)

Shorten was always in one of those situations where he damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t regarding his pending appearance in the witness stand at the Trade Union Royal Commission. But it is too late now as Shorten has made the choices he has and has to live with the consequences.

From here on in the only words that really count are the words coming from Bill Shorten, Counsel Assisting Jeremy Stoljar and Royal Commissioner Dyson Heydon. It’s game on.

If you would like to follow this site by free email notification you can at the top right of this page and about twice a week you be notified when there is a new post on this site.

This website is independent and reliant on donations to keep publishing. If you would like to support the continuance of this site please click on the button below to donate via PayPal or go to the donations page for other donation options (Click here to go to the Donations page)

You can also support this site by buying a t-shirt or coffee mug at my online shop (Click here to visit the shop)

Thank you for your support.

18 replies »

  1. Let’s hope the egomaniac gets caught up in his own lies this time! He’s too confident by far that he’ll walk away again looking like the White Knight!

  2. Will he leave his former wife to hang out to dry over share dealings? This will be a test to see what type of man he actually is.

  3. I wrote to you, Shane, about some union stuff down here in Geelong recently. Is there any chance that extra issues, like these, might be raised at the Commission? One of the local papers advertised for people to come forward regarding underpayments by Go Traffic, a local traffic control company, which, it was estimated, might owe it present and past workers up to $2 million in wage underpayments. The AWU placed the advertisement, but it is interesting that Go Traffic had an EBA (and probably still does) with the CFMEU, which allowed the CFMEU to send in its industrial officers to examine the company’s books, at any time. This was, to my knowledge, not done, and one time, when I went to the CFMEU head office in Carlton, I asked one of the industrial officers (these are the guys that look at the books) what had happened with the investigation? This guy said he did not know-problem being that the investigation, as far as CFMEU-related activities on that part, had gone mysteriously quiet. Nothing ever happened with Go Traffic after that. Interestingly, the owner of Go Traffic is an ex-policeman who had serving police moonlighting at his company, which is apparently against copper’s rules!!!


  4. Honourable William Shorten,
    Honorable=defined as:
    1. in accordance with or characterized by principles of honor; upright.
    2. worthy of honor and high respect; estimable; creditable.
    3. bringing honor or credit; consistent with honor or good reputation:

    Bill Shorten, honorabel- yeah right!

  5. I seriously hope that it is Ms McNaughton examining Bill not Jeremy Stoljar, she is tenacious and not afraid to call out the poor memory syndrome. I expect Gillard will be watching so she can call out his misogyny if he dares look at his watch or raise his voice to a woman SC. Crickets chirping and pigs flying over a field of tumbling tumbleweeds.

  6. Just when did Ms Beale get a notice to produce her financial/shareholding records? Was it before 12 June? Makes you wonder if Shorten was forced to come out with the statement on 12 June that he had volunteered to appear because TURC had already started its investigation of his time with the AWU Vic branch. Shorten a champion manipulator of the truth to his advantage.

    • Make no mistake, Shorten was forced to make his statement to the media because the Royal Commission supoenaed him & as Shane said that Shorten had to make the statement and instruct his lawyers to bring his evidence earlier at the RC to prevent the media reporting on more & more evidence of his corrupt ways. I agree that Shorten is a major manipulator but through the reporting on Social Media on Shorten’s grubby ways, well Shorten has already lost in the court of public opinion.

  7. Shorten wasn’t at all keen to respond to the allegations raised by Bob Kernohan, but Commissioner Heydon said that even though it was likely Kernohan was right, unlike Gillard did with Athol James, Shorten didn’t unequivocally deny them, so he didn’t have to appear to answer them!

  8. Shorten should stand down while he is on investigation by the RC just as he insisted on Sinodinos doing and subsequently did. Shorten is a bloody crook and it shows up in every word he utters. Plebesick is no better but she will take the Labor party down the tubes. Allan from Myalup WA.

  9. This fellow is a rogue & a habitual liar- It’s sad & disgraceful that we the Taxpayers continue to waste our money on scumbags like him.

  10. I know you don’t like off topic posts but since he is bound to be a person of interest in the TURC in connection with Shorten and the AWU, how dumb in the head does KPMG have to be to make Piggy Howes a partner?!

  11. Great to see Shorten caught out on a lie re his Neil Mitchell interview. Pathetic excuse given to the press this evening – he didn’t want to make a diabolical situation worse. Well what has he done now as leader of the ALP being caught out on this lie. Ben Fordham caught him out on the same lie about 10 months ago so he had the opportunity to fess up then but chose to be a coward. Not only is Shorten a liar but is also a coward who can’t face up to his own deceptive conduct. Lets hope the Royal Commission gives him a real going over.

Leave a Reply