Ita Buttrose, former ABC Chair, gave evidence under oath on the witness box on Tuesday (11/2/25) in Antoinette Lattouf’s unlawful termination case against the ABC and Ms Buttrose did not hesitate to perjurer herself like no tomorrow.
I published a video on Tuesday night (11/2/25), as per below, which focuses on a key piece of Ita Buttrose’s perjured evidence and it’s well worth watching.
The video contains media reports on Ita Buttrose’s evidence, a section of ABC Managing Director David Anderson’s affidavit filed in the same court case and part of Media Watch’s Monday show (10/2/25). When put together there is no doubt Ita Buttrose gave knowingly and deliberately false evidence under oath.
The key issue which proves perjury by Ita Buttrose
Why did Ita Buttrose go over ABC Managing Director David Anderson’s head and start dealing directly with the ABC’s Chief Content Officer Chris Oliver-Taylor?
Ita Buttrose gave evidence she was directed to do so by David Anderson, but David Anderson gave contradictory evidence saying he told Ita Buttrose he would prefer she didn’t.
The below video lays out the key evidence:
(Click here to watch the above video on the Kangaroo Court of Australia YouTube channel)
Media reports on what Ita Buttrose said under oath in court about why she went directly to Chris Oliver-Taylor
I posted the below message on Twitter while Ita Buttrose was on the witness box giving evidence on Tuesday:
Tweet 1
Ita Buttrose’s big lie under oath.
Ita claims ABC’s MD David Anderson told her to forward complaints about Antoinette Lattouf to ABC’s Chris Oliver-Taylor so he could learn what happens when you employ someone without doing proper checks #ItNeverHappened #PerjuryTime (Click here to see on Twitter)
Tweet 2
Ita gave evidence she had never before sent complaints directly to ABC’s Chris Oliver-Taylor, in the 5 years she was the ABC’s Chair, and only did it because the ABC’s MD David Anderson told her to.
Reality: Ita decided to override Anderson to make sure Lattouf was sacked (Click here to see on Twitter)
The SMH reported on Tuesday (11/2/25): “Anderson asked her to forward the emails onto content chief Chris Oliver-Taylor so he could “learn the folly of not checking the references of somebody that we hired”, says Buttrose.”
The Mumbrella website reported on Tuesday: “In a revealing line, repeated twice, Buttrose said David Anderson had wanted her to email chief content officer Chris Oliver-Taylor to teach him a lesson about “the folly of not checking references”. (Click here to read more)
ABC Managing Director David Anderson’s affidavit contradicts Ita Buttrose’s evidence
David Anderson’s affidavit – Page 14 paragraph 59 as per below: (Click here to read David Anderson’s full affidavit)

David Anderson’s affidavit – Page 15

I published a video titled “ABC’s Ita Buttrose to feel the heat on the witness stand in Federal Court” and an article on the 9th of February titled “Ita “We owe her nothing” Buttrose to give evidence in the Federal Court this week” which said in part:
The Gaurdian reported on the same issue,
“Oliver-Taylor said he was put between a “rock and a hard place” when it came to Lattouf’s position as a casual presenter on ABC Radio Sydney. He detailed “pressure from above” from colleagues, including the then chair, Ita Buttrose, over Lattouf’s appointment. He said: “The chair [Buttrose] was directly writing to me, the chair’s office and the chair were directly forwarding me more and more and more concerns and naming me as a respondent in the claims … There was pressure from above, I accept that.”
Ita Buttrose’s big problem on the witness stand
Why did Ita Buttrose communicate directly with ABC content chief, Chris Oliver-Taylor? Once Buttrose did that she was overriding the Managing Director in a day-to-day operational matter and both Managing Director David Anderson and Chris Oliver-Taylor would have been aware of that and felt pressured to act.
The chairperson of any company or organisation should only be dealing with the CEO / Managing Director with the exception of when lower-level managers present to the board on various issues.
Ita Buttrose also should not have been anywhere near the complaints from the Lawyers for Israel WhatsApp group and if they emailed her complaints directly she should have emailed them back with a link to the ABC’s website page for making complaints and that is all she should have done.
Once Ita Buttrose started emailing Chris Oliver-Taylor directly with the complaints from the “Lawyers for Israel” WhatsApp group and telling the group that Oliver-Taylor was dealing with it she was also in effect telling Oliver-Taylor to do what the “Lawyers for Israel” WhatsApp group want. (Click here to watch the video or click here to read the article)
Conclusion
The ABC and it’s lawyers and barristers have all thrown Ita Buttrose under a bus but maybe they had no choice because that is the only lie she could tell or would tell. They all knew there would be contradictory evidence that would expose Buttrose for perjury.
Ita Buttrose knew her actions were an abuse of power and that is why she lied under oath.
Ita Buttrose emailed the Lawyers from Israel WhatsApp Group directly before and after Antoinette Lattouf was sacked which shows where Buttrose’s loyalty was and still is.
Antoinette Lattouf’s unlawful termination case is set down for another 2 days on the 27th and 28th of February for closing arguments. I would expect the judge to reserve his decision and then likely give a judgement 3 to 6 months after that, although it could be longer.
Please use Facebook, “X”, email and the other buttons below and help promote this article.
Kangaroo Court of Australia is independent media and is 100% crowdfunded by readers like yourself so please support on the links below. Click on the PayPal button below to donate or for other donation options click here to go to the Donations page.
Thank you for your support.
For the KCA t-shirt shop click here.
For the Fugitive Clothing t-shirt shop click here
Join the free email subscription below and you will be notified immediately I publish new articles which is normally twice a week.
Discover more from Kangaroo Court of Australia
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: ABC






Buttrose had the gall to refer to Lattouf as an activist. I believe that she herself was behaving an an activist by supporting the Jewish Council and reacting to their complaints. It appears to me to have been extreme bullying to support her beliefs.
Bullying indeed. It would be illuminating to know the membership of “Lawyers for Israel”. They have inflamed anti-semitic feeling and should be prosecuted and disbarred for it. And to think it has been done in our name and at our expense.
She is a part Jewish catholic. Give me an activist any day.
Ms Buttrose should have stayed with 9 media, more her style and now best she relies on the ‘can’t recall’ defence… don’t believe her evidence will affect her credibility or the credibility of ABC in general, neither are deemed by large percentage of former ABC viewers to be worthy of much at all. Murdoch must be most happy with his believers who control content of the once reliable ABC news and current affairs departments. ABC close to being on par with horrible horrible Sky. Neither have high ratings or number of supporters.
IMO the writing was on the wall for the integrity of the ABC from the 2018 mid-terms when Steve Bannon was given a platform on 4 Corns & 7.30 respectively per the capable hands of Sarah Ferguson, who ultimately melted before his lying blarney. When one assumes that senior journalists will do their homework and hold their ground rather than cave like teenage groupies – whether or no the broadcaster insists on giving a right wing criminal Trump strategist oxygen – it’s hasta la vista national broadcaster.
That Ita can perjure herself is merely par for the decline, begging the question as to how it was she who got the top job. So have to agree with Alison Aplin’s comment with my own take on Ita’s ‘activist’ comment that it was a typical conservative ‘projection’ (e.g. classic Trump) – with which it seems David Anderson was in tacit agreement.
It’s a whole ABC culture thang now, whereby bipartisanship means toadying to the conservatives in a shift to the Right.
One of the most arrogant displays from a witness giving testimony I’ve ever seen. David Anderson was not just thrown under the bus, he was hurled under it. Incriminating statements she had made were flippantly dismissed as ‘human errors’. And I’m beginning to think that the ABC definition of an ‘activist’ is simply anyone who expresses an opinion. Watching the various levels of ABC management desperately trying to avoid admitting that this whole sorry affair was nothing more than a knee-jerk capitulation to a coordinated action by one of the Zionist lobby groups was pretty depressing.
Couldn’t agree more. Appalling, the lot of them. Even without them being owned by the pox on the planet, Zionism.
Thanks for this KCA.
Let’s hope this court case exposes this almost manic micro managed control these “Operatives” have had over the media and political narrative in this country for decades. This hasn’t happened over night, this behaviour has been going on probably since the forced establishment of Israel in Palestine.
I wrote to the “Letters to the Editor ,SMH”, well over 20 years ago about the history of the forced settlement in Palestine. The SMH refused to post it, so I contacted the editor in a phone call and he politely told me, apologising, look I know everything you have written is factual and correct. But If the SMH were to publish this, by morning tea time, we would be inundated by a hundreds of complaints, from over half a dozen different Jewish operative organisations, threatening to unleash their usual hell fire on Fairfax media, the SMH. He said, it’s pathetic state of affairs and completely wrong, but management has directed, that it’s just not worth the hassle to take them on.
This is the same tactic used on Buttrose and the ABC, that they have used for decades!
That is what we are dealing with in this country. These well coordinated operatives need to be exposed for just what they are, which really is just a “piss and wind bluffing machine”, that needs to be held to the exact same account, as everyone and everything else in this country, should be allowed to speak the truth, with real facts, with free speech.
Well spoken 👍
We have always had the rich and powerful influencing the governance of Australia but has there been an example of a political movement not part of our national or state parliaments been allowed to have so much control over our parliament, our media and now our laws and rights to free speech and opinion?
It is steadily and disturbingly creeping into the very substance of our society and culture. Zionism is with Nazism one of the most evil and brutal political movements that has ever existed on this earth.
There is no place for it in multi-cultural Australia and anyone who is part of this machine of mass killing, lying and theft should go and live in Israel.
Furthermore, anyone who takes part in the colonising of Palestinian lands and murderous activities of the Israeli Defence Forces or other political activities, ought not be permitted to return to Australia.
Our media, especially the ABC and our governments and those persons of prominence and significance who have not spoken out against the recent spate of genocidal actions in order to grab more land through ethnic cleansing, are shameful, and morally deficient.
Australians have much to do to improve the lives of the First Peoples and therefore, they owe it to all ethnic groups to be treated with fairness and respect; not to be oppressed by one menacing group as has happened here in the Latouf case.
I think everyone has had enough of the Israel lobby at this point.
When they bullied the Sydney Theatre Company (also publicly funded) into a grovelling apology in November 2023 we could see what sort of scumbags some of these Zionists are. Just thugs.
The return of antisemitism has been encouraged by default and deftly politicised by both parties. Instead of bowing to the ‘Israel lobby’ and spewing nonsense in response to the violence such as Albanese’s “we will hunt you down”, “this should not happen in Australia”, Federal and state governments of all stripes should be unified in clarifying for their constituents the religiopolitical distinction between Judaism and Zionism and the fundamental fact that not all Jews are Zionists – nor even practitioners of Judaism.
No one – least of all secular and practising Jews both in Israel and among the diaspora such as here in Australia who do not support Zionism – should have to bear the brunt of domestic antisemitic violence as some inevitable dimension of the range of community responses to the appalling, disproportionate atrocities committed by war criminal Netanyahu and his right-wing government.
Nor should anyone suffer unduly from the dismal failure of the leadership to prevent the fomentation of antisemitism in Oz, and Albanese needs to grow a pair and soon.
Perhaps then our ABC might attend to its remit for the Australian people and raise itself to real bipartisanship in the process without offending anyone.
This latest embarrassment for the ABC adds to the stench that has surrounded it over the last two plus decades. Its independence has been shattered by both political and foreign interference.
All the talk regarding foreign influence in recent times has been very misleading and selective. All we hear about is China China China and Russia Russia Russia but not a peep about US or Israel’s intensional and targeted interference.
The foreign influence by these two so-called allies is rife causing untold damage to our global reputation,national security and social cohesion. Not to mention the continual erosion it has caused on our civil liberties and free-speech that passed Australians fought and died for.
Ausralia’s mainstream media, especially the once independent ABC, can no longer be relied upon to provide in partial, honest and factual news or current affairs without fear or favour.
Support independent media while we still can. There has never been a greater need for it.
As far as I can see, this underground network of Zionists is not restricted to Australia. Its tentacles appear to reach into countless western governments.
KCA, you appear to be one of only a few lights that shine in the darkness. # respect! Keep up the good work!
It is outrageous that the court has issued a 10yr order preventing the names of those activists in the Lawyers for Israel WhatsApp group – so much for “open justice being done and seen to be done”.
However I am certain that within a day or two of Lattouf’s dismissal they themselves were perfectly open about who they were and some used the own names when proclaiming how proud of their power to control the public narrative.
Unfortunately I didn’t note the names at the time as it never occurred to me that they would now be demanding anonymity.
It is so uplifting to read the (standard of) comments in this Article. I have hope for Australia many of us knew rises to the top and shows the World its resilience.
When one looks at who appointed Ita Buttrose, that tells us that the attack on the ABC is still being continued.
Shall the Court sentence Ita- perjury? giving leadership in that domain and where it is sorely needed, to show that there is a price to be paid b y perpetrators who flout so freely the standards, morals, principles and values, that so many have fought for in many ways, to make and keep our Australia,
Kangaroo Court Australia. your efforts and determination are fully respected.
From a former “Friend of the ABC” yes, we did have such groups to support the,ABC, and the Journalists and staff who gave us a highly regarded News Source until more recent times had self serving groups/persons infiltrating “our ABC”.
In today’s increasingly litigious society, I find it necessary to preface my remarks with a disclaimer: The following satirical commentary is a work of fiction and should not be construed as a statement of fact.
Once upon a time, in the grand halls of Australian media, there reigned a figure known as The Empress Buttress, once celebrated for her pioneering efforts, The Empress has now become a caricature of her former self, her legacy crumbling like a poorly constructed sandcastle.
The Empress, who once championed journalistic integrity, now seems more interested in silencing dissent and pandering to powerful interests. Her recent actions have revealed an arrogance that borders on delusion, as she dismisses valid criticisms and concerns with a wave of her imperial hand.
It’s a tragic downfall for someone who once held such promise. The Empress has become a relic of a bygone era, clinging to power while the world moves on without her. Her attempts to maintain relevance are as transparent as they are pathetic, and it’s clear that her time in the spotlight has come to an end.
In conclusion, The Empress Buttress has squandered whatever goodwill she once had. Her legacy is in tatters, and she has no one to blame but herself. It’s time for her to step aside and make way for a new generation of leaders who value integrity over arrogance.
Utterly convincing. Ita learned her morals from the Packers. She allowed herself to be pressured by her elderly Dover Heights girlfriends as well as the organised campaign. Disgraceful.