There is clear-cut evidence that Premier Mike Baird’s government uses intimidation for political gain which could and should be classed as terrorism. I will use three documented examples of the corrupt conduct of Mike Baird’s government in this article but I know there are many others.
A google search says terrorism is: “The unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”.
Given that this site is an anti-corruption site it could be said that this website is involved in the “the fight against terrorism”. For example the political terrorism by the likes of Premier Mike Baird.
Mike Baird’s merry men of terrorists are gutless fools like most terrorists as you will see below. They talk tough but when confronted they run and hide.
Terrorism example one and two – Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton – Threats and intimidation – Mike Baird’s Correspondence Manager Gayle Mitchell
On the 9th June 2015 I sent an email to Chief Justice Bathurst and NSW Attorney-General Upton, all the Supreme Court judges and others which started off:
Dear Chief Justice Bathurst and Attorney-General Upton
Kerry Stokes, his lawyer and fellow applicant Justine Munsie and barrister Sandy Dawson are clearly involved in bribing four NSW Supreme Court judges to have ex parte hearings and to issue orders in Stokes’ favour. The latest being Justice Davies who issued orders ex parte on Friday to make me take down 2 articles.
Any matter is hard pressed to justify one ex parte hearing and they should be extremely rare. Four ex parte hearings for one party in their favour and with court orders in their favour is a disgrace and a clear pointer to judicial bribery taking place. (Click here to read the full email)
(An ex parte hearing is a hearing with only one party there and without the knowledge and/or consent of the other party. The other party (in this case me) is denied natural justice as they cannot defend themselves and as such ex parte hearings should only happen in extreme situations)
On the 25th June I received an email on behalf of the NSW Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton which said the standard line that they cannot intervene and that I should appeal. It also said:
“It is also not appropriate for you to publish the contents of such correspondence on your website as they are defamatory in nature and can be regarded as a contempt of court.” (Click here to read the full email)
I found that to be an amazing statement as there is no judgment saying I have defamed anyone and how can exposing corruption be in contempt of court. I wrote back and said:
From: Shane Dowling
Sent: Thursday, 25 June 2015 10:27 AM
Subject: RE: Your correspondence to the Attorney General – (Matter15/002565)
You say below that “It is also not appropriate for you to publish the contents of such correspondence on your website as they are defamatory in nature and can be regarded as a contempt of court”.
On what basis do you say that “they are defamatory in nature”. And please point me to the judgment that says that.
And on what basis do you say “can be regarded as a contempt of court”.
And when is speaking the truth a contempt of court?
I notice you make no mention of the applicants unjustified ex parte hearings being a contempt of court, why is that?
Kangaroo Court of Australia
I received no reply so I sent another email on the 25th August and said if they did not reply that I would write to the Premier. Once again no reply which I interpret as Premier Baird approving their conduct. (Click here to read the email chain)
For the Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton having a faceless person (no name on the email) write to me and say what I had written is “defamatory in nature and can be regarded as a contempt of court” is a clear attempt to use “intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”. The political aim in this matter is to cover up the corruption of Channel 7 owner Kerry Stokes bribing NSW judges.
These are possibly some of the same NSW judges who were bribed $2.2 million by the mafia. (Click here to read more) This is not the first time the Baird government have used the defamation threat to try to intimidate me. In March this year a week before the state election Premier Baird’s Correspondence Manager Gayle Mitchell made numerous threats against me including threatening me with frivolous defamation proceedings that she did not follow through with. (Click here to read more) There is aa obvious pattern starting to emerge on how Premier Mike Baird and his government operate.
As a side note NSW Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton is a former corporate lawyer and New York merchant banker who has sacked 7 government drivers in 2 years as a Minister. (Click here to read more) I wonder why? Is she paranoid they know too much? She sounds like a real nutter.
Terrorism example three – Assault by NSW Court Sheriffs
On the 24th of August 2015 I was at the NSW Supreme Court for a directions hearing. I made a complaint on the 26th August 2015 that is set out below which was also sent to the Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton. There would have been at least 40 witnesses in Court who saw the below complaint happen.
Dear Ms Linda Murphy – CEO & Principal Registrar Supreme Court of NSW
I am writing to you in relation to criminal conduct by a Supreme Court of NSW Sheriff which occurred on Monday the 24th of August. The conduct includes contempt of court, intimidating a witness and assault. This was aided and abetted by Registrar Rebel Kenna.
I was representing myself in court on Monday in the matter Munsie and Ors v Dowling 2014/114469 which was before registrar Rebel Kenna and I asked her to transfer the matter to another registrar and she refused. So I gave her a mouthful as I have had her before and she does whatever barrister Sandy Dawson (who represents Kerry Stokes, Ryan Stokes and Munsie) says in a clearly blatant way.
Some background: The case is a frivolous and vexatious defamation matter where I am being sued that has gone nowhere for almost 18 months as Kerry Stokes has no intention of going to hearing. Everyone knows that when I am allowed interrogatories and discovery the case will be withdrawn by Stokes. The judges and Kenna have been aiding and abetting in the delaying tactics.
What I said to Rebel Kenna on Monday was within the confines of the 2004 High Court of Australia judgment Coleman v Power which is quoted and referenced on the Judicial Commission of NSW website.
On two occasions when I was standing at the Bar Table addressing the court the Sheriff came up to me and threatened me in an extremely aggressive manner saying words to the effect “I have warned you” when he did not like what I had said to the Registrar.
This was clearly done to intimidate me in an attempt to deny me natural justice. It was also clearly contempt of court as a Sheriff does not have authority to threaten someone at the Bar Table. It also constitutes intimidating a witness which is a criminal offence.
Both times the Sheriff came up to me he came within 30 centimetres. So much so I could smell his stinking breath. Once again this shows he was trying to intimidate. He also deliberately invaded my personal space and his actions fall within the definition of assault as outlined on the Judicial Commission of NSW website at: http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/criminal/assault.html
This email is a formal complaint and I want action taken and a response to what has or hasn’t happened. Rebel Kenna is also liable as she allowed it to happen in her court and therefore obviously approved of it.
I would also like the Sheriff’s name in case I need to take the matter further
The response I received was basically a cover-up by the Supreme Court CEO Linda Murphy. (Click here to read) She replied a month after the complaint and said she had read the transcript for that day and would not do anything. (It was not the complete transcript. It deliberately left out the part where I was threatened by the Court Sheriff about 20 minutes earlier) Amazingly Linda Murphy never bothered to talk to any witnesses and ask what happened. Or most likely she did and then decided on the tactics to cover it up. She said she had passed on the complaint to the Court Sheriff who has not been in contact.
At no stage did Linda Murphy deny what I allege in my complaint which is in effect admission given how serious the complaint is. It is a bit hard to deny it when there were 40+ witnesses.
Once again this is an Australian court using physical threats and intimidation against litigants who blow the whistle on corruption and the people and politicians above giving it complicit approval by their non action. This is clearly a type of terrorism. How many other people have been illegally threatened by court sheriffs when they are standing at the bar table trying to defend themselves?
I won’t say more now as I will follow up with the above complaint.
The bottom line is: Do the three examples I used above fall under the definition of “The unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”. I say they do which makes Premier Mike Baird a terrorist.
The fake Premier Mike Baird is slowly being exposed for who he is by the “Internet Truth Train” and I doubt history will be kind to him.
Admin: I am currently working a full-time job and working on this website part-time which means I am not posting as regularly until finances allow me to work full-time investigating and reporting. The problem with the link in the email notification not working last week was an issue with the host of this site which put the wrong publication date in the article URL. Hopefully it is fixed now.
Please use the Twitter, Facebook and email etc. buttons below and help promote this post.
This website is independent and reliant on donations to keep publishing. If you would like to support the continuance of this site please click on the button below to donate via PayPal or go to the donations page for other donation options. (Click here to go to the Donations page)
If you would like to follow this website you can by email notification at the top right of this page and about twice a week you will be notified when there is a new article.
You can also support this site by buying a t-shirt or coffee mug at my online shop (Click here to visit the shop)
Thank you for your support.