I wrote an email to all the judges of the Supreme Court of NSW accusing Justice Lucy McCallum of being a suspected paedophile and Justice McCallum has decided, in a published judgment, that it is such a minor issue that it does not warrant her standing aside from hearing a matter where I am the defendant. Justice McCallum is also aware of the many articles I have published accusing her of taking bribes and that is even a more minor issue it seems going by her judgment.
The key point to this article is that calling judges paedophiles and accusing them of taking bribes is now in the public domain in a published judgment and so it is now open to public discussion. It is worth noting that Justice Lucy McCallum does not deny the allegations I make. And if calling a judge a suspected paedophile is such a minor issue that they do not have to stand down from hearing a matter then it is obviously not a crime either.
Justice McCallum published her judgment on the 4th of April 2018 and paragraph 20 is the relevant part regarding the email. The email was sent on the 6th of September 2016 and it also names 15 other judicial officers and 2 registrars as being either paedophiles or suspected paedophiles. I was charged by the police in June 2017 for sending the email but the charge was withdrawn on the 28th March 2018 because the CDPP decided what I wrote was either true or it was political communication protected by the Australian Constitution as per the 1997 High Court judgment Lange v ABC.
I recorded the below video outside the Supreme Court of NSW on Friday the 29th June 2018.
(Click anywhere on the above video to watch)
Justice McCallum’s decision is consistent with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions dropping the malicious police charge for sending the email. But the police said to me when they charged me in June 2017 that they would contact everyone named in the email, and possibly lay further charges, which means they would have contacted Justice Lucy McCallum and if they didn’t that raises the question of why not. The reality is that it was a malicious charge in the first place and that is why it was withdrawn.
The relevant section of Justice Lucy McCallum’s judgment is below. The matter is Capilano Honey v Shane Dowling defamation case and it was part of a recusal application that I had originally flagged I wanted heard but later withdrew. It was actually the applicant’s lawyers who pressed the issue for Justice McCallum to recuse herself (stand down from hearing the matter) although they claim they were just assisting the court.
- Separately, in addition to the matters listed by the plaintiff, the following further matters are relevant to the objective test in the present case. First, Mr Dowling has now criticised many judges. As already noted, the publications were not in evidence on the application but it was common ground. The plaintiffs relied on the fact that Mr Dowling has asserted in an email (which I have never seen) that numerous judicial officers are paedophiles or suspected paedophiles and has also raised allegations of judicial bribery. Mr Dowling has stated in a subsequent email that I was named in that previous email as a suspected paedophile. In my assessment, the volume and vehemence of such publications would tend to dilute the impact of anything Mr Dowling has previously said about me; I have become one of a large mob. (Click here to read the full judgment)
Contrary to what Justice Lucy McCallum says above a number of the publications were in evidence including the original email sent on the 6th of September 2016 where I named Justice Lucy McCallum as a suspected paedophile.
Below is the email I sent to Chief Justice Tom Bathurst and all the other NSW Supreme Court judges which is the email that Justice Lucy McCallum refers to in her judgment where she is named as a suspected paedophile.
From: Shane Dowling
Sent: Tuesday, 6 September 2016 11:35 PM
To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; chambers.beech-jonesJ@courts.nsw.gov.au; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Paedophile Judge list to be sent to the AFP, Australian Crime Commission, NSW Crime Commission and Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse for investigation
Dear Chief Justice Bathurst, Justice Hoeben, Justice Price, Justice Simpson other judges
I am writing to you all regarding the list of paedophile judges that I intended on making a formal complaint about to the AFP, Australian Crime Commission, NSW Crime Commission and Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse. The list is below.
Chief Justice Tom Bathurst – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Clifton Hoeben – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Derek Price – NSW Supreme Court (He is also Chief Judge of the NSW District Court)
Justice Carolyn Simpson – NSW Supreme Court
Judge Richard Cogswell – NSW District Court
Judge Garry Neilson – NSW District Court
Magistrate Doug Dick – NSW Magistrates Court
Justice Ian Harrison – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Lucy McCallum – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Peter Hall – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Michael Adams – NSW Supreme Court
Acting Justice Henric Nicholas – NSW Supreme Court (now retired)
Acting Justice Robert Hulme – NSW Supreme Court
Justice David Davies – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Peter Garling – NSW Supreme Court
Justice Stephen Campbell – NSW Supreme Court
Registrar Rebel Kenna – NSW Supreme Court
Registrar Christopher Bradford – NSW Supreme Court
If you are on the list and would like a right of reply to deny that you are a paedophile and argue that you should not be on the list, please email me by close of business Wednesday the 7th of September 2016. I will also likely publish the list on my website, if you would like me to publish a reply please send me one by 5pm Wednesday the 7th of September.
If you are not on the list but have evidence of paedophile judges, please contact me on the details below.
As we all know corruption in the NSW Courts is widespread and systemic. In July 2015 Fairfax Media and the ABC’s Four Corners program reported that NSW judges had been bribed $2.2 million by the Mafia which was confirmed by Justice David Davies in December 2015. Maybe you have evidence that the above judges have also benefited from the Mafia bribes or other bribes. If you have evidence of judicial bribery, please contact me ASAP.
The email first appeared in the article I published on the 8th of September 2016 titled: “Paedophile priest gets 3 months jail for raping 3 boys by NSW Supreme Court’s Justice Hoeben“ (Click here to read the article)
This is a public discussion that needs to be had with all the judgments giving paedophiles either minimal sentences and in some cases no sentence all. There are no laws or legitimate precedents allowing the judges to give paedophiles a few months jail or suspended sentences. The judges are breaking the law when they do it and without a doubt at the very least some of those judges are paedophiles themselves and it is time for it to be exposed at the political level and the first step is for the public to be able to speak openly about it without the threat of jail.
I will publish a follow-up article with further relevant laws and precedents to the above which will be an eye opener for many.
Please use the Twitter, Facebook and email etc. buttons below and help promote this post.
Kangaroo Court of Australia is an independent website and is reliant on donations to keep publishing. If you would like to support the continuance of this site, please click on the button below to donate via PayPal or go to the donations page for other donation options. (Click here to go to the Donations page)
If you would like to follow this website, you can by email notification at the top right of this page and about twice a week you will be notified when there is a new article.
Thank you for your support.