Lawyer Jeremy Leibler, who is the President of the Zionist Federation of Australia, has publicly attacked federal Senator Nick McKim in a letter with lies, which puts Mr Leibler in breach of the Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules, and he should be struck off as a lawyer.
Jeremy Leibler made public his letter to Senator Nick McKim, which was obviously designed to intimidate, bully and deceive the public into believing criticism of Zionists is antisemitic and therefore against the law.
Jeremy Leibler’s lie that criticism of Zionists is antisemitic was exposed by Justice Desmond Fagan last week, and after finding criticism of Israel is not antisemitic, he says at paragraph 118 of his judgment:
“Criticism of Zionism, the movement that established Israel and continues to support it, stands in the same position as criticism of Israel itself.” (Click here to read more)
I’ll outline the evidence and background to Jeremy Leibler’s public lies and deception first, then deal with the relevant laws he has breached at the end.
It’s worth noting that Jeremy Leibler and his father Mark Leibler have a long history of harassment of people they don’t like. For example, last year I wrote about them “using social media to menace, harass and offend supporters of Palestine while at the same time Australia is introducing new hate speech laws.” (Click here to read more)
And earlier this year I published an article titled “Zionist Jews Mark Leibler and Jeremy Leibler have Palestinian-Australian Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah sacked from Adelaide Writers’ Week“.
(This article is a follow-up to my previous article titled “Justice Desmond Fagan confirms Israel’s genocide in Gaza and exposes the Antisemitism Royal Commission’s big lie“.
Senator Nick McKim’s comments about Zionists and the Labor Party
The reason for Jeremy Leibler’s attack on The Greens’ Senator Nick McKim is because of what Senator McKim said in the Senate on the 20th of August 2026, as per the below video.
Senator Nick McKim accused the Labor Party of being “captured by fossil fuel interests” and “captured by Zionist interests” etc.
Liberal Senator James Paterson objected, and McKim replied “don’t worry mate, you’re captured by Zionist interests as well.”
So why did Liberal Party Senator James Paterson intervene to defend the Labor Party? He wasn’t defending the Labor Party, he was defending Zionism which is disturbing.
Senator James Paterson’s actions support the allegations I made in my July 2026 article titled “Israel bribes Liberal Senator James Paterson with free legal services from Arnold Bloch Leibler and Angus Taylor’s Israel trip” and my August 2026 article titled “Senator James Paterson earns his Israeli $$$ by publicly attacking antisemitism Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell“.
On Sunday the 23rd of August, Mark Leibler, as President of the Zionist Federation of Australia, sent a letter to Senator McKim complaining about what Senator McKim said in the above video. Leibler made the letter public as per below:
Dear Senator McKim,
This week you accused the Australian Government and Senator James Paterson personally of being “captured by Zionist interests”. When challenged, you defended that language. You later said you were happy to reflect on it. I am writing to ask you to do exactly that.
Your words cannot be divorced from what has transpired in this country. The terrorists responsible for the Bondi massacre, which claimed the lives of 15 people, condemned “Zionists” as they articulated their justification for the attack, and then opened fire on a Jewish Chanukah celebration.
For generations, antisemites have accused Jews of exercising hidden or improper influence over governments and public institutions. The conspiracy was given its most notorious expression in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was relentlessly propagated by Nazi Germany, and was used to cast Jews as a sinister force manipulating governments and societies from behind the scenes.
Australia is home to one of the world’s largest communities of Holocaust survivors. They experienced, in the most horrific way imaginable, the consequences of a society accepting the proposition that Jews constitute a powerful, conspiratorial force exercising hidden influence over national life.
Today, this ancient prejudice is increasingly given a contemporary vocabulary, with “Zionist” substituted for “Jew”. For the overwhelming majority of Australian Jews, Zionism is an integral part of their Jewish identity. Dressing an ancient antisemitic trope in contemporary language does not make it any less antisemitic.
We have seen the consequences of this rhetorical sleight of hand since 7 October. Hostility towards “Zionists” has repeatedly been used to vilify, exclude and intimidate Australian Jews. The Australian Greens have played a deeply troubling role in perpetuating and legitimising this rhetoric.
For a Senator of the Australian Parliament to allege that our government has been “captured” by “Zionist interests” would be deeply troubling at any time. To do so after the antisemitic terrorist attack at Bondi, amid the most serious escalation of antisemitism Australia has experienced in generations, and while a Royal Commission is examining antisemitism and its drivers, is both reckless and dangerous.
I invite you to visit the site of the Bondi massacre. Stand where Jewish families gathered to celebrate Chanukah and where 15 innocent people were murdered by terrorists who spoke of “Zionists” but chose Jews as their targets. Speak to Australian Jews about what it means to hear the language of sinister “Zionist” power and influence repeated from the floor of their own Parliament.
Then reflect on the particular responsibility that comes with being an elected representative. Political leaders cannot absolve themselves of responsibility for dangerous rhetoric simply by substituting the word “Zionist” for “Jew”.
Having reflected, you should withdraw your remarks and apologise unreservedly to the Australian Jewish community.
Jeremy Leibler
PRESIDENT
In the letter, Jeremy Leibler dishonestly tries to conflate Zionists with Jews, which was exposed as the IHRA antisemitism definition scam by Justice Fagan in his judgment last week.
Jeremy Leibler’s father is well aware of Justice Fagan’s judgment, as he has been posting attacks on it by the Murdoch media on “X”. Such as here and here.
Jeremy Leibler complains in the first paragraph, “This week you accused the Australian Government and Senator James Paterson personally of being “captured by Zionist interests”.
The irony being that Senator James Paterson, in the above video and even though he is a Liberal Party Senator, jumped to the defence of Zionists as soon as their link to the Labor Party was mentioned.
It is also ironic that I have recently published the financial links between Senator James Paterson and Jeremy Leibler’s own Israeli-supporting law firm, Arnold Bloch Leibler.
Senator Nick McKim responded to Jeremy Leibler with his own letter on Monday the 24th of August 2026, as per below:
Jeremy Leibler has breached the Solicitors Rules
Jeremy Leibler is a lawyer for his fathers’ law firm, Arnold Block Leibler in Melbourne and is bound by the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015, which also applies to lawyers in NSW and WA.
The Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner oversee the conduct of lawyers and barristers in Victoria, so complaints about Jeremy Leibler or other lawyers should be directed there.
Jeremy Liebler made his letter to Senator McKim public to try to silence and intimidate members of the public with his lies. And probably trying to influence and intimidate other politicians and the Antisemitism Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell.
Jeremy Leibler would be well aware of Justice Fagan’s judgment, but instead of attacking Justice Fagan with his lies, which would be a blatant breach of sections 3 and 3.1 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015, he uses his lies to attack Senator McKim.
Jeremy Liebler’s public attack on Senator McKim is also a breach of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015 sections 3, 5, 28 and 42 etc.
For example, section 5 says:
Standard of conduct—dishonest or disreputable conduct
5.1 A solicitor must not engage in conduct, in the course of legal practice or otherwise, which—
5.1.1 demonstrates that the solicitor is not a fit and proper person to practise law, or
5.1.2 is likely to a material degree to—
(i) be prejudicial to, or diminish the public confidence in, the administration of justice, or
(ii) bring the profession into disrepute.
Jeremy Leibler is clearly not a fit and proper person to be a lawyer and has brought the profession into disrepute. He should be struck off as a lawyer.
Admin: This website and the Kangaroo Court of Australia YouTube channel are 100% crowdfunded and are able to publish articles and videos because of the supporters who chip in each month.
If you find my reporting of value and you’re not yet a monthly supporter but would like to be, you can see all the donation options on the donations page by clicking here.
Amounts from $3 to $100 (or whatever works for your budget) make a real difference. There’s no lock-in, you can cancel or adjust anytime.
Your support, whether it’s a monthly donation, a one-off donation, or just sharing my work, is what keeps independent voices like this one alive.
Thank you for your support.
Please use Facebook, “X”, email and the other buttons below and help promote this article.
Kangaroo Court of Australia is independent media and is 100% crowdfunded by readers like yourself so please support on the links below. Click on the PayPal button below to donate or for other donation options click here to go to the Donations page.
Thank you for your support.
For the KCA t-shirt shop click here.
For the Fugitive Clothing t-shirt shop click here
Join the free email subscription below and you will be notified immediately I publish new articles which is normally twice a week.
Discover more from Kangaroo Court of Australia
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Senator James Paterson, Senator Nick McKim
I’d call the outburst by Jeremy Leibler panic. The Zionists have spent years manipulating people about antisemitism which has now been found to be totally incorrect. Leibler is attempting to change the outcome of Justice Fagan’s ruling.
If I wanted to be cruel, I’d say this calculated deception is hilarious. Israel, the IDF and Zionists in general have perpetrated absolute cruelty against an innocent race of true Semites, the Palestinians, in the form of a recognised genocide. They need to be held to account for such atrocities.
Does this mean that people are finally waking up to what’s going on, and are taking up the mantle to return their fraternity to some semblance of what ‘free’ actually means? Rather than the distorted Libertarian Paternalist Heist? What exciting times we are living in! Maybe the eternal flame of the ANZACS has just sparked a blazing fire and Aussies and Kiwis can get back to cherishing the soil we walk upon! Black, white, yellow, brown – all our colours. Bravo Nick. One individual can change the world – because they show the way. No more ARC Israeli think tank. No more Corporate government pretending to be Constitutional. Aussie egalitarianism returns. One million people who went to Canberra to demand Truth are one million individuals who continue to change the world! Starting with Aussie Land (until we work out what “Australia” actually means). 😉
Again, bravo Nick
Time to clear these Zionist genociders out of our population, especially those in our governments.
The Leiblers both of them are assisting hatred in this country, which is where terrorists come from. Senator Paterson you are a disgrace. Why don’t you go to Isreal to live if you so strongly about Israel, take the Leibler brothers, if they are brothers with you. Look at what the Israelies have done to the Children in Gaza..
No, Mark Leibler is the farther and his son is Jeremy Leibler.
I definitely want them farther away from us.
Senator Paterson is a lightweight pscyhopant.
Jeremy Libeler!!
Thank you for continuing to highlight the power that these avowed Zionists have in Australia and its largely duped politicians and general population. Keep it up
Senator Nick McKim accused the Labor Party of being ‘captured by fossil fuel interests, captured by Zionist interests, captured by, ah, the Five Eyes security…’
Jeremy Leibler argued that ‘the language invokes a longstanding antisemitic trope about Jews exercising hidden influence over governments and institutions.’ However, despite what the Nazis may have claimed 100 years ago, he would be hard-pressed to deny the current attempts of Israel and its facilitators amongst the Australian zionists to influence Australian Government policies. For one thing, they are not secret: the many free trips to Israel given to Australian politicians have been made public (although, in their entirety, probably not as public as I would have liked); their public attempt to influence local government through their all expenses paid trip to the Gold Coast antisemitism symposium last year; the never-ending flow of public rhetoric from the Leiblers, Alex Ryvchin, Jillian Segal et al; and the well-publicised attempts, by various zionist groups, to disenfranchise (by de-platforming or getting them sacked from their jobs) anyone who expresses even the mildest criticism of Israel’s behaviour. Not to mention the barrage of zionist propaganda from the Murdoch media. And, of course, the Government-backed imposition of the IRHA definition on all of us via our major institutions. Financial donations to the parties should probably be added to this mix as well, although this avenue of influence seems to be much more prevalent in the US.
So, I’m a little unclear why Jeremy Leibler is trying to deny these very obvious attempts at influencing Government policy.
A Zionist is someone who supports Zionism, which is the movement advocating for the creation and ongoing support of a Jewish homeland in the historical region of Palestine, today understood as the State of Israel.
The UN General Assembly voted in favour of it in 1948 and so did Australia.
Are the anti-Zionists intent on destroying Israel?
99% of countries have recognised the State of Palestine. Most anti-Zionists just want to see an end to the illegal occupation and a return to 1967 based borders.
The offer to selected Politicans of free legal representation by the Leibler’s legal practice is also a form of bribery.
It can be seen as an offer of free legal advice, assistance or legal representation to Politicians who promote or contest on behalf of Zionists.
Of course criticism of Israel is not antisemitic, just like criticism of Islam is not “islamophobic”. Get rid of the hate speech / blasphemy laws! “You want to live in a Democracy and you never want to be offended again? Well you’re an idiot!” (Steve Hughes).
Especially with the anti-semitism/ant-Zionism dispute, a lot of the beliefs formulated by politicians (and by most all of us) were cemented early in their lives. This is the common, indeed the normal, time in which people develop fixed opinions, opinions which are very hard to shift by emergence of new contra-information. And, not to be underestimated, base self-interest may also be served by the belief too. The awful truth of the Holocaust and every other act of repulsively real anti-semitism over the centuries has interacted with a common almost instinctive belief. This is the unspoken, unexamined, belief that a person (or peoples) who are or have been victims of injustice and persecution is incapable of acting in the same way. They exist in some kind of state of grace, having learnt from their awful experience and, saint-like, would never do the same. Such wisdom is attainable theoretically, but in reality it is attained only by a few. In the context of Zionism, for example, Victor Klemperer and Hannah Arendt seemed to have been aware of this from the 1930s. Most victims seem to learn something different, something like: Do to others what has been done to you. This reality that the victim is not immune to the same victim-making impulses is encapsulated in the “wood eye/would I” joke (told to me by Champion Jack Dupree!). How about those with fixed beliefs to try the simple exercise of switching the names of all the protagonists while keeping the facts. Do their opinions stick with the facts or change with the names? Does the inexcusable suddenly become excusable? Or do they suddenly find the facts become un-facts? Or do their thoughts shy away like trying to force together two like poles of a magnet? Simple exercise but hard to do.
This situation highlights a troubling intersection of political lobbying, free speech, and professional ethics.
Justice Fagan’s recent ruling drew a clear line in the sand: criticizing a political movement or ideology is not inherently antisemitic.
Attempting to use the weight of a legal title to pressure an elected senator for pointing out political lobbying isn’t just an attack on Nick McKim—it’s an attempt to chill legitimate public debate on foreign policy. Furthermore, the immediate defence of the status quo by politicians on both sides only serves to prove the point about institutional capture.
If the Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules state that a practitioner cannot engage in misleading or disreputable conduct ‘in the course of legal practice or otherwise,’ then using public letters to conflate political debate with hate speech should absolutely be scrutinised by the Legal Services Commissioner.
When public figures use intimidation tactics instead of addressing the core issue of political influence, it only diminishes public trust in both our political and legal systems.”
The same person whom on social media menaced, harassed and threatened Australian Jews by calling them equivalent of Nazis if they didn’t support Zionism and the Gaza genocide. That sounds VERY hateful to me and, possibly illegal. These people have zero self awareness of their own hypocrisy; are completely unhinged and barely tethered to reality.
Sad that when “The Lucky Country” desperately needs strong leadership which cares for electors, we have a wobbly knees effort in both the houses – Representative and the Senate. Our leaders have no feeling for working Australians being career politicians with snouts in the taxpayers trough.
A very sad state of affairs (pun intended).
Absolutely, the Labor Party no longer represents the working class, instead they seek to bribe their electorate with the promise of free “stuff” that future generations will have to pay off.
Israeli leaders have justified the state of Israel and Palestinian genocide on Old Testament scriptures. That’s a religious belief system. Commission envoy Jillian Segal has demanded that the Royal Commission mandate full endorsement of the IHRA definition of antisemitism in our colleges and schools. That’s a mandate of compulsory religious values compliance for the general population. There is no way this abuse should be allowed to stand. Whether university or kindergarten, this compulsory (and fraudulent) religious tripe should be banned in its entirety.
Firstly, thank God for the Greens.
Secondly how long will it take for the Lieblers to be penalized for their gross misrepresentation of antisemitism and lies? How do they get away with it, as lawyers?